🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the issue sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.